Many UK organisations believe they are well protected because they have invested in cyber security tools, completed compliance assessments, or passed audits. Yet cyber incidents continue to occur at an alarming rate.
In most cases, the root cause is not a lack of technology, but a lack of visibility into how people, processes, and controls actually operate together in practice.
This is where a cyber security gap analysis becomes essential. It provides a clear, structured view of where security controls are effective, where they are failing, and where hidden risks exist that could be exploited by attackers.
A cyber security gap analysis is a structured assessment that compares an organisation’s current security posture against recognised best practice, regulatory expectations, and real-world threat scenarios.
Rather than focusing purely on technology, an effective gap analysis examines security across four critical areas to understand how risk is actually managed day-to-day.
Skills, awareness, roles, and accountability across the organisation.
Policies, procedures, and the consistency with which security is applied in practice.
Configuration, coverage, integration, and how tools are actually used.
Oversight, ownership, escalation, and security decision-making.
These gaps are increasingly exposed by ransomware, supply-chain attacks, regulatory scrutiny, and incident disclosure requirements where assumptions quickly fail under pressure.
Many organisations assume that purchasing more tools automatically reduces risk. In reality, poorly configured
or poorly integrated technologies often create blind spots rather than protection.
Incident response plans may exist on paper but are rarely tested. When an incident occurs, roles are unclear,
decisions are delayed, and valuable evidence is lost.
Suppliers and partners frequently have access to systems or sensitive data, yet are not assessed to the same
standard as internal operations. This creates unmanaged exposure beyond organisational boundaries.
Human error remains one of the leading causes of cyber incidents. Generic awareness training rarely changes
behaviour without being relevant, targeted, and reinforced.
Compliance is a starting point, not a safety net.
Threat actors do not target organisations based on frameworks or certifications. They exploit weaknesses in configuration, processes, and human behaviour. A cyber security gap analysis bridges the gap between compliance and genuine risk reduction.
We start by understanding how your organisation actually operates day to day. This includes business priorities, decision-making structures, risk ownership, and how security responsibilities are applied in practice, not just on paper.
We examine security controls across people, process, technology, and governance. The assessment focuses on how consistently controls are implemented, how effective they are in real scenarios, and where gaps exist between policy and reality.
We support proportionate, risk-based action to address identified gaps. This may include clarifying ownership, improving processes, strengthening controls, or supporting decision-making where immediate change is required.
Where appropriate, we help embed improvements so security becomes more resilient over time. This focuses on sustainable change, improved readiness, and alignment with how your organisation actually manages risk.
Cyber security gap analysis is not about scoring or compliance. It is about enabling confident, informed decision-making when security becomes a leadership issue.
UK-based cyber security specialists helping organisations reduce risk, respond to incidents, and build long-term resilience.
Trusted by UK organisations across critical sectors.
General enquiries and incident support.